Amps n More
June 18, 2013, 06:23:05 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:     Schematic Heaven    Ted's Home Page
                                                                                                               
Tube Data       Bias Calculator        Tone Stack Calculator   Preamp Calculator   Electronics Calculators     Weber Kits
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: CLIPS: A/B-ing the Weber Neomag, Weber Cali, JBL D120-F and Weber Michigan  (Read 4026 times)
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« on: February 05, 2010, 03:42:32 PM »

I used a Dr. Z EZG-50 amplifier head, and an USA custom Strat (Alder Body, maple neck with rosewood fretboard) with Don Mare "Night Flyer" pickups.



12" Neomag, 8 ohms, cloth surround, paper dome - in Pro reverb cab

12" California, Ceramic magnet, paper dome, 8 ohm - in Pro reverb cab

JBL D-120 F. Reconed, with who knows what parts, in 1987, metal dome, cloth surround, 8 ohms. In Princeton reverb cab

Weber Michigan, 12", 8 ohms ,ceramic magnet, paper dome, in a J-Designs 1x12 cab (semi open back)


http://www.seanet.com/~pauls/Jbl_ish_speakers_and_Mich_edited.mp3




JBL  0 -> 0:49
Neomag   0:50 ->1:16
Cali   1:28 -> 2:20
Mich  2:28 -> 3:30
JBL 3:35 -> 4:06
Neomag  4:10 -> 4:49
Cali 4:50 -> 5:52
Neomag  5:55 -> 6:18
JBL 6:20 -> 6:44
Mich 6:45 -> 8:10
JBL 8:16 -> End

« Last Edit: May 21, 2010, 03:28:52 PM by pula58 » Logged
Dr. Robert
Top Of The Heap
Top Of The Heap
*****
Posts: 1777


Surfin' With Santa


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 05:59:12 PM »

Can't hear your commentary on the sound clip...
Logged

Back to square 1 (from 1,012 posts)
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 06:09:30 PM »

Hey Dr. Bob,
You've got to turn up the volume to hear my commentary. It's because the recorder (Zoom Q3) was set to low-sensitivity so as to not distort from the (much louder than my voice) guitar sounds.

The Q3 recorder has an auto-gain level setting mode. That would have helped in terms of hearing my comments... but I dislike the associated compression since it is not true to the actual sound.
Logged
joey_truelove
Master
****
Posts: 321


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2010, 06:51:16 PM »

The JBL seems to be the least coloured of the lot and, no surprise here, my ears gravitate towards the California. The Neo seems more... it seems fatter, yet at the same time brighter than the JBL - but I guess that could change with some breaking-in.

I do see why you like the Michigan, though. It's kind of smokier and deeper in a soulful, jazzy kind of way. Kind of sniffing up the alley of a Fane in terms of response, not counting breakup and overtone content.

Great of you to share this curved cone lineup with us, Paul. The recording could do with a few dB more in volume, though. Did you normalise it? Volume is on full everywhere but I can unfortunately barely make out your commentary.
Logged
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2010, 09:13:40 PM »

I'll try to boost up the commentary!

P.
Logged
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2010, 09:46:24 AM »

O.K., I edited the file to bring-up the dialog and cut out some dead air.

By the way, I was using a Dr. Z EZG-50 amplifier head, and an USA custom Strat (Alder Body, maple neck with rosewood fretboard) with Don Mare "Night Flyer" pickups.

12" Neomag, 8 ohms, cloth surround, paper dome - in Pro reverb cab

12" California, Ceramic magnet, paper dome, 8 ohm - in Pro reverb cab

JBL D-120 F. Reconed, with who knows what parts, in 1987, metal dome, cloth surround, 8 ohms. In Princeton reverb cab

Weber Michigan, 12", 8 ohms ,ceramic magnet, paper dome, in a J-Designs 1x12 cab (semi open back)

Here is the new link to the edited file:
http://www.seanet.com/~pauls/Jbl_ish_speakers_and_Mich_edited.mp3

and the timing:

JBL  0 -> 0:49
Neomag   0:50 ->1:16
Cali   1:28 -> 2:20
Mich  2:28 -> 3:30
JBL 3:35 -> 4:06
Neomag  4:10 -> 4:49
Cali 4:50 -> 5:52
Neomag  5:55 -> 6:18
JBL 6:20 -> 6:44
Mich 6:45 -> 8:10
JBL 8:16 -> End
« Last Edit: May 21, 2010, 03:26:23 PM by pula58 » Logged
Dr. Robert
Top Of The Heap
Top Of The Heap
*****
Posts: 1777


Surfin' With Santa


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2010, 10:51:17 AM »

Wow, nice comparisons and very informative.

 HdBang
Logged

Back to square 1 (from 1,012 posts)
joey_truelove
Master
****
Posts: 321


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2010, 05:44:41 PM »

Good going, mate! You could do this for a living, you know! Cheesy :) nice Do you have clips of other speakers as well?
Logged
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2010, 12:10:15 PM »

yah, I have a 12F150 and 12F150 B too...and some other speakers too....
Too many speakers, so little free-time!

Logged
joey_truelove
Master
****
Posts: 321


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2010, 01:40:48 PM »

The 150B speaker I know very little about, except it being a Jensen-type speaker with a British cone. Would be nice to hear one some time... ;)
Logged
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2010, 01:48:34 PM »

when I get a little time....

I was thinking it would be interesting to A/B my Pro Reverb with A) Neomag and cali (both paper dome) compared to B) 12F150 and 12F150 B

soon....
Logged
joey_truelove
Master
****
Posts: 321


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2010, 02:35:50 PM »

In deed it would be! I'll stay tuned for future contributions of yours.

Life is sweet when time is on one's side...
Logged
Teleguy61
Master
****
Posts: 449


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2010, 06:16:18 PM »

Paul thanks for the clip-it is very informative.
I, for one, would love to hear the comparison of the Neo and the Cali and the 150s.
Waiting eagerly.................
Logged
tapslore
New Member
*
Posts: 2


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2010, 08:05:01 PM »

great demo!  really shows the strengths of each speaker; just pick a flavor that works.

pula58, my only question is on the efficiency.  you said the JBL was the loudest, but can you give us a general idea of how loud each one was relative to the others?

(slight OT: man, the zoom Q3 sounds AMAZING; hopefully it'll lead more folks to record their rigs.  waiting for mine to show up :).)
Logged
pula58
Senior
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2010, 09:17:07 PM »

It seems to me that the JBL is the most efficient for sure.
The Michigan, so far, seems the least efficient

and the Neomag might be slightly more efficient than the Cali.

The thing that is a little confusing is that the volume of all the speakers (except the JBL) seems to be getting a little louder as the speakers break-in. Is that possible? Or, is it just a psychological effect.  You know, the dreaded A/B-itis.

update: I am actually not sure if the Neomag is louder than the Cali. Sometimes the Cali seems more efficient than the Neomag
« Last Edit: February 14, 2010, 04:41:21 PM by pula58 » Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!